It appears the only difference is you get an electronics upgrade (the new ES2 expression system, mine has the ES1) and you get a hard shell case instead of a hard taylor ⦠Taylor 114ce vs 214ce vs 314ce May 8, 2018 by Marko Taylor, or Taylor Guitars, is one of the world-class leaders in the guitar manufacturing industry â itâs not a coincidence that weâre so interested in pitting their finest models against each other, as these guys arenât capable of making a bad guitar. I tried the 214 when I was looking, nice guitar. Instead it trades some shimmer and sparkle for a reliability and even-keel tonality I came to greatly respect. Now that weâve taken a brief look at the Martin D-15M, itâs time to look at the Taylor side of our Martin D-15M vs Taylor 214ce comparison. Its design demands a degree of playing perfection I can't always guarantee. I enjoyed the Taylor sound more. Lv 7. The neck is made from sipo, another mahogany subs⦠The Martin will be a fuller sound but the Taylor will cut through the mix better. For ⦠I threw this together early this morning. Relevance. Resonance is understated but pleasant, low and mid ranges are very present and even. Thanks for visiting. I have no regrets! High end is sparkly, mid-range is even and balanced, and low end is acceptable. 2105 Taylor, 2015 Martin, and 2016 J45. Post Dec 13, 2017 #1 2017-12-13T11:06. 57 1. For me, the Martin represented a true middle of style, dynamics, and sound â while still having a voice of its own. GPCRSGT: The Martin has a much more "lived in" sound. Once you hit a grand, I think it's worth investing more. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Taylor Guitars. Martin and Taylor both offer a great selection of tonewood combinations, and they even have custom shops if you want to design a completely new guitar from the ground up. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. Neck design is a big factor in this section. Over time however, and likely in part as a function of my skill level, I found playing it akin to riding a mustang. Nothing against Taylor, I still really like them, but that Martin OMC-1E has a great feel and the tone is just incredible. You can find a good used on in your price range easily. The insane expressiveness of this guitar sometimes made it feel like the guitar was driving me, not the other way around. I saw one for sale locally on Craigslist ⦠- Once the guitar bug has bitten you and you know you're going to stick with it, it's inevitable that you're going to want to upgrade your beginner guitar. I own a 2013 fall limited 214ce. While a great deal of development is helped through machines, a large number of the devices Taylor utilizes were outlined by Taylor and stay restrictive to Taylor. Martin gpcrsgt vs martin dcpa4 vs Taylor 214ce soft strum and Martin gpcrsgt vs martin dcpa4 vs Taylor 214ce soft strum and picking: pin. The Taylor feels and plays so smoothly and is so expressive. These guitars have laminate Sapele back and sides. After playing an embarrassing number of guitars at GC, I settled on two: the Taylor 214ce and the Martin Road Series GPCRSGT. While tone shaping isn't as expressive, I found that the control knobs (which reside just inside the soundhole) were much easier to address during play. I play a mixture of strumming and fingerpicking, and needed a versatile guitar that could do both live. The neck design meant chord flying is a dream, and while fingerpicking is suitably engaging, it doesn't have quite the same airy feel of the Taylor. I'm about to pick up a new acoustic, and have narrowed it down to the GPCPA5K and the 114ce. The 214ce's fingerboard slopes back slightly at the edges, and its neck is slightly smaller. Registered Member. In fact, Taylor and Martin have always been ⦠I think I've narrowed it down between a Yamaha AC3R, a Martin GPCRSGT, or a Taylor 214ce DLX.. For me, the Taylor easily is the most aesthetically pleasing, I also enjoy the simplicity of the pickup (just bass, mid, ⦠Taylor, Martin is a favorite among professionals gibson g45 vs taylor 214ce hobby players alike style is suitable for just about,! It exchanges a measure of nuance for an almost "compressed" and even play feel, as if it were absorbing mistakes. So, it isnt a Taylor vs Martin preference, it comes down to craftsmanship. I'm not asking which is "better," and I understand that the ⦠Essentially the same guitar but by different builders. Recently, I had the opportunity to play the Martin GPCRSGT and thought the sound was dull and almost "muddy". Hey GS, long time lurker first time poster. I know that's probably not what anyone wants to hear, but you'll get a superb instrument out of the extra couple hundred. Certainly not rich and bold/loud like the Taylor. What's the Best Guitar: Taylor, Martin, or Gibson? Both are "Grand Auditorium/Performance" body profiles, and ⦠Background: After 10 years of "making it" with my $400 Seagull S6 Original Dreadnought, I finally decided to upgrade my acoustic. The best place to start if you're new is right below in our "Rules" section. The USA made Martin DCPA4 has the tone, deep lows and bright highs and it plays very well. GPCRSGT: The Martin's sound is like "everyguitar, but elevated." My advice to anyone thinking about a serious acoustic guitar is the following: stop in to a George's Music near you and try as many guitars as you can, ⦠Martin's and Taylor's are so different that it is strictly a personal choice. Chris Mckee compares Taylor's 314ce to Martin's GPCPA4. Background: After 10 years of "making it" with my $400 Seagull S6 Original Dreadnought, I finally decided to upgrade my acoustic. And the Taylor 214ce certainly looks the part. GPCRSGT: The best way I can describe the Martin is "forgiving." 214ce: Even light fingerpicking rings out confidently. I ended up buying the Martin. Thank you!! Last year My decision came down to the same two model guitars and I also bought the the 214ce. Both guitars are equipped with pickup systems. Over to You. Its the same as a 214ce except it came with a hard shell case and an expression system upgrade from the ES-T system. The neck and fingerboard shaping is also different. GPCRSGT: The Fishman Sonitone pickup system is much simpler, with only volume and a single tone knob (dark to bright). I ended up buying a Cole Clarke, because it has a completely different vibe to the others, and more significantly it was different to the one I had at home. Straight off the wall it sounded like a recording. I grew to love the GPCRSGT throughout this process because of how approachable and inviting it is. 214ce: Like the guitar itself, the ES2 pickup system captures and enhances every dynamic and percussive nuance. I currently play acoustic predominantly, however want to become more versatile and learn guitar pedals/electric stuff too. Depending on your situation, you may want to upgrade to a great guitar. Both Taylor 110e and Martin DX1AE are acoustic-electric guitars that happen to be available in the same price range. The guitarâs Sitka spruce top features a high quality gloss finish, but what really sets the 214ce apart in terms of aesthetic appeal is the gorgeous satin finish on the layered Indian Rosewood sides and back. It comes at a more affordable price point, yet it boasts superb tonal qualities. Will the Martin you linked (GPCPA4) sound better than the Taylor? The Martin a I played had a richlite fretboard which I wasnât a fan of either. I like elixir strings, but unless I keep fresh strings on all the time, that sound subdued as well. Scouring online, I found very few resources directly comparing the two guitars, despite being the same price point from the two most-known acoustic manufacturers. They all have different qualities that make them special. After playing an embarrassing number of guitars at GC, I settled on two: the Taylor 214ce and the Martin Road Series GPCRSGT. High end tones are a bit subdued (due in part to Martin's stock Lifespan strings) during fingerpicking, but come out rich and controlled when strumming. Ipad recorded, using an Apogee MiC. Martin DCPA4 vs Martin GPCRSGT vs Taylor 214ce - Video Comparison Martin DCPA4 vs Martin GPCRSGT vs Taylor 214ce - Video Comparison. The ES2 system seems to subtly enhance the overall sound of the guitar. As for the Martins, the DCPA4 had the best tone, followed by the GPCPA4. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. This is a forum where guitarists, from novice to experienced, can explore the world of guitar through a variety of media and discussion. I have a pet theory that the Martin feels slightly less premium because of the cost involved with supplying a hard case vs. gig bag. The Taylor 214ce is a Grand Auditorium-bodied acoustic guitar ⦠I really liked the Martin too, but it seemed like a cheaper model by comparison. I was even considering saving up for this Gibson Songwriter which is my dream acoustic-electric instead of the Taylor... New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. The GP in the name stands for grand performanceâa relatively new body style for Martin, sort of a 14-fret mini jumbo, slightly wider and deeper than an OM (15.75 inches wide compared to 15 and 4.5 inches deep compared to 41/8). 214ce: If you're planning to record an intricate classical fingerpick, or wide-panned acoustic strumming in a heavier pop or rock mix, the Taylor voicing is perfect. Let's start off by saying if I only could have one it would be the Martin DCPA4. I suspect it would need very little mix processing, but the weaker low end does concern me. Itâs got a Sitka spruce top; the back and sides are sapeleâa sit-in for mahogany. This is a very dynamic guitar, translating (for better or worse) every nuance of your playing. Don't get me wrong, the MIM Martin & Taylors are really nice quality, but at the 500-700 price range. Taylor in that way holds many licenses on ⦠That's a great idea and honestly one that I've considered greatly. Let's start off by saying if I only could have one it would be the Martin ⦠Related: Taylor 214ce Full Review. Martin GPCPA5K vs Taylor 114ce. This guitar begs for long-session play, and I found myself repeatedly coming back to the comfort of its vibe after sessions with the hotter Taylor. What helped drive home the decision was my GC rep's willingness to re-string it with the Elixir Nanowebs the Taylor uses (and which I'm used to playing) for testing. The GPCRSGT is a bit thinner ⦠Martin VS Taylor â The Sound. So Iâd almost want a guitar that resonated the sound all the time once the strings are broken in. Taylor 214ce guitar costs around $200-$300 more than other company guitars, and yes thatâs a problem for many. Good review. Putting low end in is never as successful as removing it. Please, if you have any experience with any of these, I'd love to hear about it. yell03. It's difficult because I'm looking to upgrade my electric guitar from an Epiphone Les Paul to a G&L Tribute ASAT Classic Bluesboy Semi-Hollow too. The 114ce is part of the Taylorâs 100 series of acoustic guitars. Martin vs. Taylor: Sounds. So I was wondering what you thought of these 2 guitars in terms of quality. Iâd actually expected to get the Martin, but figured Iâd need to go up to the next bracket/price range to get a Martin that would change my life. Like you, I went in and spent hours trying about 6 guitars, switching back and forth before going home to sleep on it. Which one should I go with, and why? I hope this helps anyone looking to make a similar decision. Taylor 214ce Standard. 2008 Taylor 314ce Grand Auditorium Acoustic-Electric Guitar - YouTube Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. For me, the Taylor easily is the most aesthetically pleasing, I also enjoy the simplicity of the pickup (just bass, mid, treb buttons). Smooth but somewhat lacking low girth. If you do prefer that warmer kind of tone, then the 114ce will be a better choice for you and as a bonus youâll save a few dollars. I thought it might be useful to others to share my experience, having spent a total of 4.5 hours comparison testing. Very interesting and detailed review. In a perfect world, maybe I'd own both. The Taylor 214ce is a member of the Taylor 200 line. Since you seem to like the GP body style, I'd recommend saving for something like this. In comparison to the 214ce, the 114c⦠The Yamaha has been claimed as the most durable, however I'm not sure if I agree quite yet. Both Martin and Taylor offer a variety of body shapes and combinations of wood that result in a whole range of different tones so weâll have to speak pretty generally. Explore the Taylor Guitars Line. Over summer vacation a few weeks ago my father in law offered to put up a few dollars towards a new acoustic guitar for me. Now if we could just buy both then we wouldnt have this issue :), Yeah Iâve pretty much guaranteed myself to re-string every 2-3 months ð. the Taylor 214ce is refurbished model . I won't go into the designs, but suffice to say they are positioned and designed differently, and thus have very different character. I think I've narrowed it down between a Yamaha AC3R, a Martin GPCRSGT, or a Taylor 214ce DLX. I don't know what Martin is thinking with those Lifespan strings, but I can only describe them as "crusty.". The Mic was positioned about 3 feet from me, probably at forehead level - probably not an optimal placement. and the Martin GPCPA5K is Brand New (both are almost same price) i live here in italy so im gonna buy it Online from united states.. thanks in advanced!!! The GPCRSGT has a more traditionally-flat fingerboard, and a very slightly larger neck. Great info. Learn More. Taylor 214ce Vs Martin GPCPA5K anyone? I compared it to the Martin DCPA4, GPCPA4, and a GPCRSGT they had there. As soon as I heard it, I swiped my card. Taylor nylon-string models are integrated into the 200-800 Series and are designated by the letter âNâ at the end of the model name. I know it's a lot of money, but I think in 10 years you'd laugh at not spending an extra couple hundred for such a beautiful companion. Went with a Yamaha AC3R. Lose control for even a second, and it's liable to do things you don't expect or want. The 214ce is a serious guitar, that is great for gigging, the studio or even living room jams, and with the solid Spruce top will continue to sound better ⦠I came home to sleep on it, as both guitars have their strong points. Both are "Grand Auditorium/Performance" body profiles, and that manageability was one of the driving upgrade factors. Cookies help us deliver our Services. It's highly expressive, almost to a fault, and it really sings. Beyond the standard 214ce, Taylor ⦠You can't go wrong with either of these incredible guitars. 214ce: There is something ephemeral and magical about the Taylor. Thanks for reading and I hope this comparison has helped you to learn more about the differences between the 114 models and the 214 models. Usage: My formal background is in studio engineering, and I've been playing guitar at a low-to-middle-intermediate level for my entire adult life. That's the type of mindset C.F Martin is known for, traces of which can be found in any of their current vintage acoustic guitars. It sounds wonderful, rich and even, but it doesn't have the "pageant queen" sound the Taylor has. Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. Taylor Swift has one and so does Jason Mraz. Taylor 214ce: Standard, Deluxe and Plus. The Martin looks okay, but has a strange side input and no top pickup/tuner which is slightly dissappointing. The two-band tone controls (treble and bass) provide a ton of tone-shaping capability, but I also found the control position inconvenient to adjust while playing. This makes them slightly warmer in tone compared to their older brothers in the 200 series.When comparing the 114ce side-by-side with the 214ce I could definitely notice the difference. Logged Taylors:â14 PS14CE-FLTD, 814-CE ... 2011 Taylor 814ce 2012 Taylor 214ce-n 2011 Taylor GS Mini 2012 Blueridge BR-40 2012 ⦠Thank you! 514ce-N = 500 Series nylon-string Grand Auditorium with a cutaway and electronics. Also coming from my seagull S6. The GPCPA3 is a very similar guitar to the OMC-1E. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts.